Board of Education v. Hood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Board of Education v. Hood, 204 N.C. 353 (N.C. 1933)
Brogden
Board of Education v. Hood
Opinion of the Court
Tbe cashier’s check described in tbe evidence did not constitute a statutory preference as defined by C. S., 218(c). In re Bank, ante, 143. See, also, Morecock v. Hood, Comr., 202 N. C., 321, 162 S. E., 730. Nor do tbe facts constitute a preference upon tbe trust fund theory as interpreted in Parker v. Trust Co., 202 N. C., 230, 162 S. E., 564; Williams v. Hood, Comr., ante, 140. See, also, Flack v. Hood, Comr., ante, 337.
Reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- BOARD OF EDUCATION OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY, and T. H. REEVES, Treasurer of BUNCOMBE COUNTY v. GURNEY P. HOOD, Commissioner of Banks, and G. N. HENSON, Liquidating Agent of CENTRAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published