Ferrell v. . Insurance Co.
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Housing Authority of City of Salisbury (N.C. 1952)
- Cauley v. General American Life Insurance (N.C. 1941)
- Williamson v. Pilot Life Insurance (N.C. 1937)
- Nellie Tuttle Wiles v. Nationwide Life Insurance Company (4th Cir. 1964)
- Smith v. Pilot Life Insurance (N.C. 1939)
- Peterson v. Sucro (4th Cir. 1939)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Civil action to recover on a $2,000 policy of life insurance.
Upon the hearing the issuance of the policy in suit upon the life of plaintiff's husband, she being named as beneficiary therein, the payment of the first semiannual premium on 26 April, 1932, and the death of the insured on 5 February, 1933, were all admitted. Thereupon, the plaintiff offered in evidence an official receipt for the semiannual premium due 26 October, 1932, found by her after her husband's death, and rested. The genuineness of the signature on this receipt was not questioned.
In answer, the defendant offered evidence tending to show that the semiannual receipt of 26 October, 1932, was issued upon tender of a check which proved to be worthless; that said check was returned to the assured 18 January, 1933, upon written acknowledgment by him that the official semiannual receipt of 26 October, 1932, had been lost.
In rebuttal, the plaintiff testified that the purported signature of her husband to said acknowledgment was not genuine.
The Court directed a verdict for the defendant, and from the judgment entered thereon the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors. The plaintiff made out a prima facie case. The defendant offered evidence tending to show that the policy in suit lapsed *Page 52 for nonpayment of semiannual premium due 26 October, 1932. The credibility of defendant's defense was challenged by plaintiff's denial of assured's signature to the written acknowledgment. This made it a case for the jury.
There was error in directing the verdict.
New trial.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.