Bulluck Auto Sales Co. v. Meyer

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Bulluck Auto Sales Co. v. Meyer, 172 S.E. 877 (N.C. 1934)
206 N.C. 198; 1934 N.C. LEXIS 138
PER CURIAM.

Bulluck Auto Sales Co. v. Meyer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on authority of Barco v. Forbes, 194 N. C., 204, 139 S. E., 227, and Bank v. Howard, 188 N. C., 543, 125 S. E., 126.

In the latter case, the following- was quoted from 8 C. J., 444, with approval: β€œOne who gives a note in renewal of another note, with knowledge at the time of a partial failure of consideration for the original note, or of false representations by the payee, waives such defense and cannot set it up to defeat or reduce the recovery on the renewal note.”

No error having been made to appear of which defendant can complain, the judgment will not be disturbed.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bulluck Auto Sales Company v. William Meyer.
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published