Gordon v. . Fredle
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Quality Auto Parts Co. v. Bluff City Buick Co. (Tenn. 1994)
- Penley v. Penley (N.C. Ct. App. 1984)
- Lewis v. Shaver (N.C. 1952)
- Progress Solar Solutions, LLC v. Fire Protection, Inc. (District Court, E.D. North Carolina 2019)
- Pearce v. NC STATE HIGH. PATROL VOL. PLEDGE (N.C. 1984)
- Pearce v. North Carolina State Highway Patrol Voluntary Pledge Committee (N.C. 1984)
- Pearce v. North Carolina State Highway Patrol Voluntary Pledge Committee (N.C. Ct. App. 1983)
- Pressley v. Continental Can Co., Inc. (N.C. Ct. App. 1979)
- Price v. JC PENNEY COMPANY, INC. (N.C. Ct. App. 1975)
- Jewell v. Price (N.C. 1965)
- Powers v. Planters National Bank & Trust Co. (N.C. 1941)
- State Ex Rel. Hicks v. Purvis (N.C. 1935)
- Swinson v. Lance Packing Co. (N.C. 1935)
- El Omari v. Buchanan (2d Cir. 2022)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The cause of action alleged in the complaint accrued at the date of the publication of the defamatory words, which the plaintiff contends are actionable per se. 37 C. J., 17; 17 R. C. L., 372.
*735 All tbe evidence shows that the said defamatory words were published in 1923 or 1924, and that the action was begun on 19 February, 1929. The action was not begun within six months after the cause of action accrued, and for that reason is barred by the statute of limitations. O. S., 444.
It is immaterial that the action was begun within six months after the plaintiff discovered that defendants were the authors of the letters containing the defamatory words. Blount v. Parker, 78 N. C., 128, Fox v. Wilson, 48 N. C., 486. There is no provision in the statute that an action for slander can be maintained if begun within six months from the date of the discovery by the plaintiff that the defendant was the author of the slander, where the slanderous words were uttered or published more than six months prior to the commencement of the action. There was no error in the judgment of nonsuit. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.