Lucas v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- McEachern v. Miller (N.C. 1966)
- Monroe v. Dietenhoffer (N.C. 1965)
- Kearns v. Primm (N.C. 1965)
- Nye v. Pure Oil Co. (N.C. 1962)
- Chambers v. Dalton (N.C. 1953)
- Moore County v. . Burns (N.C. 1944)
- Atkins v. . Steed (N.C. 1935)
- Atkins v. Steed (N.C. 1935)
- Burleson v. . Burleson (N.C. 1940)
- Fertilizer Co v. . Bowen (N.C. 1934)
- Farmville Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. Bowen (N.C. 1934)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The demurrer was properly sustained on the ground of a misjoinder of both parties and causes of action. Williams v. Gooch, ante, 330; Carswell v. Whisenant, 203 N. C., 674, 166 S. E., 793; Grady v. Warren, 201 N. C., 693, 161 S. E., 319; Sasser v. Bullard, 199 N. C., 562, 155 S. E., 248. The several causes of action, united in the same complaint, do not “affect all the parties to the action,” as required by C. S., 507.
"Where this dual misjoinder occurs, and a demurrer is accordingly interposed, the decisions are to the effect that the action should be dismissed. Shuford v. Yarbrough, 198 N. C., 5, 150 S. E., 618; Roberts v. Mfg. Co., 181 N. C., 204, 106 S. E., 664.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.