The basis of the individual plaintiffs’ complaint is the allegation that they had been duly declared elected as mayor and aider-men of the town of Wilkesboro, respectively, at the election held on 7 May, 1935, and as such mayor and aldermen they were entitled to the possession of the records and other property of the municipality. This allegation is denied by the answer of the defendants, and, at the hearing, the defendants demanded a trial by jury, and, upon denial thereof, reserved exception.

Some of the defendants in this action were the plaintiffs in the case of W. H. Harris et al. v. T. S. Miller et al., which was jointly argued with this case, and this day decided, ante, 746. In Harris et al. v. Miller et al., supra, it is held that there was no valid election on 7 May, 1935, and the judgment of the court which authorized the canvass of the illegal votes cast and the declaration of the results of the invalid election is reversed. In the light of this holding, it is manifest that the plaintiffs cannot maintain this action.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, and this case is remanded that judgment directing the records and property heretofore seized by the sheriff and delivered to the plaintiffs be returned to the defendants.

Reversed and remanded.