Wilson v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Wilson v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks, 179 S.E. 660 (N.C. 1935)
208 N.C. 200; 1935 N.C. LEXIS 360
Stacy

Wilson v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks

Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

It was conceded on the argument that, upon the record as presented, the plea of payment, if established, and not that of estop-pel, constitutes the only valid defense to plaintiff’s claim. Annotation: 25 A. L. E., 170. As this was not passed upon in the court below, and the evidence directed to- the point is nebulous, the case will be remanded for further proceedings.

Error in dismissing the action upon the plea of estoppel having been confessed, necessarily works a reversal of the present judgment. An appeal ex necessitate follows the theory of the trial. Hargett v. Lee, 206 N. C., 536, 174 S. E., 498; Walker v. Burt, 182 N. C., 325, 109 S. E., 43; Shipp v. Stage Lines, 192 N. C., 475, 135 S. E., 339.

Eeversed.

Reference

Full Case Name
R. B. Wilson, Jr. v. Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks.
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published