Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935

Dailey v. Washington National Insurance

Dailey v. Washington National Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided November 20, 1935 · PER CURIAM.
182 S.E. 332; 208 N.C. 817; 1935 N.C. LEXIS 140 (South Eastern Reporter)
Dailey v. Washington National Insurance

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

Plaintiff's appeal presents two questions:

(1) Did the judge's decision contain a statement of facts found and the conclusions of law separately, as required by C. S., 569 ?

(2) Are the provisions in the policy limiting defendant’s liability valid ?

Both of these questions must be answered against the plaintiff. In his judgment Judge Williams set out the facts which he found, fully and in detail, and rendered judgment thereon constituting his conclusion of law. Eley v. R. R., 165 N. C., 78. Provisions in policies limiting liability have been upheld in Epps v. Ins. Co., 201 N. C., 695, and in Reinhardt v. Ins. Co., 201 N. C., 785, and cases cited.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.