Hood ex rel. Page Trust Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Hood ex rel. Page Trust Co. v. Johnson, 208 N.C. 77 (N.C. 1935)

Hood ex rel. Page Trust Co. v. Johnson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The court below rendered judgment for the plaintiff. In the judgment of the court below is the following: “It is perfectly apparent to the court, although not specifically admitted as a fact, that the second note was substituted for the original, and that Hamlet Ice Company is a surety for its eodefendant Johnson.” We think the court below was without power to find the fact as above set forth.

The agreed statement of facts recited: “The plaintiff and defendants respectfully agree that the facts relative to this controversy, in addition to those admitted in the pleadings, are as follows,” etc. For the reasons given, this cause is

Remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
GURNEY P. HOOD, Commissioner of Banks, ex Rel. PAGE TRUST COMPANY v. CHARLES E. JOHNSON and HAMLET ICE COMPANY
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published