Reeves v. . Miller
Reeves v. . Miller
183 S.E. 294; 209 N.C. 362; 1936 N.C. LEXIS 481
(South Eastern Reporter)
Reeves v. . Miller
Opinion of the Court
It is unnecessary to consider the exceptions discussed in defendant’s brief, as the deed attacked by the plaintiffs in this action appears on its face to be a deed of gift, and was not registered within two years as required by C. S., 3315.
The deed was therefore void. Booth v. Hairston, 195 N. C., 8.
No error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.