Gaskins v. . Lancaster
Gaskins v. . Lancaster
183 S.E. 364; 209 N.C. 301; 1936 N.C. LEXIS 466
(South Eastern Reporter)
Gaskins v. . Lancaster
Opinion of the Court
after stating the case: Was it error, upon a volte face by defendant, to refuse to undo in May what was done at his instance in February? The defendant invokes the sanction applied in Thompson v. Funeral Home, 208 N. C., 178, 179 S. E., 801. Plaintiff relies upon the doctrine announced in Rand v. Gillette, 199 N. C., 462, 154 S. E., 746. The motion was addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and is not reviewable on appeal. Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686.
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.