Gray v. . Worthington

Supreme Court of North Carolina February 26, 1936

Gray v. . Worthington, 183 S.E. 731 (N.C. 1936)

209 N.C. 582; 1936 N.C. LEXIS 301

Stacy, Devin

Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.

The nonsuit is correct on two grounds: First, it appears that the alleged parol agreement is in conflict with the written contract to convey (Ins. Co. v. Morehead, ante, 174) ; and, second, the contract to convey is not enforceable as against purchasers for value who hold prior registered title. C. S., 3309; Combes v. Adams, 150 N. C., 64, 63 S. E., 186; Hood, Comr., v. Macclesfield Co., ante, 280.

This is the only question presented by the appeal.

Affirmed.

Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name: H. T. GRAY Et Al. v. W. C. WORTHINGTON Et Al.
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published