Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936

Hood ex rel. United Bank & Trust Co. v. Tilley

Hood ex rel. United Bank & Trust Co. v. Tilley
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided January 22, 1936 · Consideration, Devin, Took
209 N.C. 842

Hood ex rel. United Bank & Trust Co. v. Tilley

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

A careful examination of the assignments of error on this appeal fails to disclose any prejudicial error for which the plaintiff is entitled to a new trial. There was evidence tending to show agreements by the payee of the note sued on as alleged in the answers, and breaches of these agreements resulting in damages to the endorsers in excess of the amount due on the note.

The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.