Head v. Prudential Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Head v. Prudential Insurance, 210 N.C. 203 (N.C. 1936)
Head v. Prudential Insurance
Opinion of the Court
The trial court correctly interpreted the privilege, accorded plaintiff in the compromise settlement, to mean that the matter could be reopened upon actual, rather than presumptive, proof of death prior to 30 December, 1923. Lewis v. Lewis, 185 N. C., 5, 115 S. E., 885. Plaintiff’s interpretation of the agreement would render the settlement meaningless.
No error.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- ROSE M. HEAD v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
- Status
- Published