Head v. Prudential Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Head v. Prudential Insurance, 210 N.C. 203 (N.C. 1936)

Head v. Prudential Insurance

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The trial court correctly interpreted the privilege, accorded plaintiff in the compromise settlement, to mean that the matter could be reopened upon actual, rather than presumptive, proof of death prior to 30 December, 1923. Lewis v. Lewis, 185 N. C., 5, 115 S. E., 885. Plaintiff’s interpretation of the agreement would render the settlement meaningless.

No error.

Reference

Full Case Name
ROSE M. HEAD v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Status
Published