Rose v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Southern Pac. Co. v. Haight (9th Cir. 1942)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of nonsuit must be affirmed on authority of Goldstein v. R. R., 203 N. C., 166, 165 S. E., 337, and Weston v. R. R., 194 N. C., 210, 139 S. E., 237. These cases are controlling upon the facts presently appearing of record.
The case of Dickey v. R. R., 196 N. C., 726, 147 S. E., 15, cited and relied upon by plaintiffs, is distinguishable in that no town ordinance was being violated by the defendant at the time of the accident as was the situation in Biekey s case, supra.
The pertinent authorities are assembled in Sessoms v. R. R., 208 N. C., 844, 182 S. E., 112.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.