One member of the Court, Schenck, J., being absent, and the remaining four being equally divided in opinion as to whether the statute permitting an administrator to execute a deed of trust on real estate is applicable to the facts in this case, the judgment of the Superior Court, in accord with the usual practice in such cases, is affirmed and stands as the decision of this case, without becoming a precedent. Caffey v. Osborne, 210 N. C., 252.

Affirmed.