One member of the Court, Schenck, J., being absent, and the remaining four being equally divided in opinion as to whether reversible error has been shown, particularly on the refusal to nonsuit, the judgment of the Superior Court, accordant with the usual practice in such cases, is affirmed and stands as the decision in this case, without becoming a precedent. Jackson v. Trust Co., ante, 733; Brown v. Assurance Society, 210 N. C., 825; S. v. Swan, 209 N. C., 836, 183 S. E., 285; Sessoms v. R. R., 208 N. C., 844, 182 S. E., 112; Beam v. Pub. Co., ibid., 837, 181 S. E., 326; Trust Co. v. Hood, Comr., 207 N. C., 862, 177 S. E., 16; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, 161 S. E., 223.

Affirmed.