Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939

Harden v. . Stockard

Harden v. . Stockard
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided January 4, 1939 · PER CURIAM.
200 S.E. 409; 214 N.C. 848; 1939 N.C. LEXIS 439 (South Eastern Reporter)

Harden v. . Stockard

Opinion of the Court

Civil action to restrain sale under execution.

From judgment dissolving the temporary restraining order and dismissing the action, the plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors. The basis of the judgment is that the rights of all the parties, judgment creditor, mortgagees, and debtors, are to be determined according to what appears upon the public records of Alamance County. In this, there is no error. Armstrong v. Price, 203 N.C. 833, 167 S.E. 77; Bank v.Sauls, 183 N.C. 165, 110 S.E. 865; Callahan v. Flack, 205 N.C. 105,170 S.E. 125.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.