Rigo Manufacturing Co. v. Pridgen

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Rigo Manufacturing Co. v. Pridgen, 215 N.C. 247 (N.C. 1939)
Pee

Rigo Manufacturing Co. v. Pridgen

Opinion of the Court

Pee CuRiAM.

As plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of notice set out in each hill of lading and designated “as a condition precedent to recovery,” its action against the carrier was properly dismissed. St. Sing v. Express Co., 183 N. C., 405, 111 S. E., 710; Culbreth v. R. R., 169 N. C., 723, 86 S. E., 624.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
RIGO MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. B. D. PRIDGEN
Status
Published