Rigo Manufacturing Co. v. Pridgen
Rigo Manufacturing Co. v. Pridgen
215 N.C. 247
Rigo Manufacturing Co. v. Pridgen
Opinion of the Court
As plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of notice set out in each hill of lading and designated “as a condition precedent to recovery,” its action against the carrier was properly dismissed. St. Sing v. Express Co., 183 N. C., 405, 111 S. E., 710; Culbreth v. R. R., 169 N. C., 723, 86 S. E., 624.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.