State v. . Rodgers
State v. . Rodgers
8 S.E.2d 927; 217 N.C. 622; 1940 N.C. LEXIS 307
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. . Rodgers
Opinion of the Court
The motion of the Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal for the reason that no appeal lies to this Court from a discretionary determination of an application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence must be allowed on authority of S. v. Ferrell, 206 N. C., 738, 175 S. E., 91, and Jarrett v. Ins. Co., 208 N. C., 343.
The case is not like Crane v. Carswell, 204 N. C., 571, 169 S. E., 160, where the “newly discovered evidence,” as this phrase is defined in the law, was insufficient to invoke a discretionary ruling in favor of the movant.
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.