Barrow v. . Barrow

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Barrow v. . Barrow, 14 S.E.2d 514 (N.C. 1941)
219 N.C. 544; 1941 N.C. LEXIS 104
PER CURIAM.

Barrow v. . Barrow

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The court having found, upon competent evidence, that the defendant in good faith denied the allegations of the complaint, was unable to defend the action or prosecute her cross action and adequately meet other expenses, that the plaintiff is financially able to pay allowances for her support and counsel fees, and (for the purposes of defendant’s motion) the facts alleged in the answer and affidavits filed in support of the motion were true, there was no error in entering the order, from which appeal is taken. Vaughan v. Vaughan, 211 N. C., 354, 190 S. E., 492; Holloway v. Holloway, 214 N. C., 662, 200 S. E., 436.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Theophilus Barrow v. Ethel Boaz Barrow.
Status
Published