Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942

Lee v. . Johnson

Lee v. . Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided October 14, 1942 · PER CURIAM.
22 S.E.2d 230; 222 N.C. 161; 1942 N.C. LEXIS 54 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Lee v. . Johnson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant Johnson, ostensible owner of a fee simple title, having conveyed the locus in quo to an innocent purchaser for value, plaintiffs’ only remedy is by action for damages for the wrongful alienation and conversion of their land by the defendant Johnson. This action was instituted more than five years after the wrongful conversion. The ruling of the court below is sustained by Davis v. Doggett, 212 N. C., 589, 194 S. E., 288. See also Ferguson v. Blanchard, 220 N. C., 1, 16 S. E. (2d), 414, and Massengill v. Oliver, 221 N. C., 132.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.