Henderson v. . Stuart

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Henderson v. . Stuart, 18 S.E.2d 705 (N.C. 1942)
221 N.C. 37; 1942 N.C. LEXIS 385
PER CURIAM.

Henderson v. . Stuart

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

A careful perusal of the record and exceptions filed in this case do not show any reversible error. The obligation of the plaintiffs was joint and several and the coplaintiff, Jonah Henderson, had the right, with the consent and approval of the owner and holder of the secured notes, to divert a portion of the proceeds received from the fire insurance company to the payment of other indebtedness. Turlington v. Lucas, 186 N. C., 283, 119 S. E., 366; Winchester-Simmons Co. v. Cutler, 194 N. C., 698, 140 S. E., 622.

In the judgment of the court below we find

No error.

Reference

Full Case Name
JONAH HENDERSON and His Wife, ETHEL HENDERSON, v. CARL R. STUART, Trustee, Et Al.
Status
Published