Carter ex rel. Carter v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Carter ex rel. Carter v. Bailey, 221 N.C. 278 (N.C. 1942)

Carter ex rel. Carter v. Bailey

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

If it should be conceded that there is evidence of negligence, and of authority of the employee of defendant, Hayes v. Creamery Co., 195 N. C., 113, 141 S. E., 340, plaintiff, by his own testimony, brings himself within the general applicable rule that passengers who are injured while attempting to get on or off a moving train cannot recover for injury. Browne v. R. R., 108 N. C., 34, 12 S. E., 958; Carter v. R. R., 165 N. C., 244, 81 S. E., 321; Stamey v. R. R., 208 N. C., 668, 182 S. E., 130; Wingate v. R. R., 220 N. C., 251, 17 S. E. (2d), 6.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
FRED CARTER, by His Next Friend, F. O. CARTER v. WAYNE BAILEY
Status
Published