Williams v. Robbins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Williams v. Robbins, 223 N.C. 658 (N.C. 1943)
Winborne
Williams v. Robbins
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs present on this appeal these two questions: 1. Are plaintiffs entitled to have the action heard in the courts of Moore County? 2. Should the temporary restraining order and injunction issued be continued to the hearing? For reasons set out in the opinion in Hunsucker v. Winborne, ante, 650, each of these questions must be answered in the negative. Hence, the judgment below is
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- C. C. WILLIAMS, J. ARTHUR STEWART, H. C. STUTTS, D. C. HAMER, G. B. HAMMOND, G. B. WILLIAMS, C. S. LEWIS, E. T. DENNIS, T. N. SLACK, E. R. BROWN, J. M. HUNSUCKER, DR. C. W. McMANUS, S. C. STEWART, W. C. LASSITER and All Other Taxpayers and Citizens of HEMP, Who Care to Make Themselves Parties v. KARL ROBBINS, Alias KALAM RABINOWITS W. P. SAUNDERS (or SANDERS), E. M. RITTER, A. F. LOWDERMILK, W. N. McDUFFIE, F. H. UPCHURCH and E. C. McSWAIN
- Status
- Published