Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945

State v. . Cox

State v. . Cox
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided December 12, 1945 · PER CURIAM.
36 S.E.2d 260; 225 N.C. 773; 1945 N.C. LEXIS 407 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. . Cox

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The only exceptive assignment of error is directed to alleged error in the charge. The defendant insists the court, in reviewing the contentions of the State, used language which tended to discredit witnesses for the defendant and, in effect, constituted an expression of opinion.

We are not persuaded the contention as stated by the court is not reasonably supported by the facts and circumstances appearing on this record. In any event it did not constitute an intimation of the opinion of the court or otherwise impinge upon the provisions of Gf. S., 1-180. Hence the assignment of error is without substantial merit.

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.