Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946

State v. . Blair

State v. . Blair
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided December 11, 1946 · PER CURIAM.
40 S.E.2d 460; 227 N.C. 70; 1946 N.C. LEXIS 346 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. . Blair

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The embezzlement statute creates an offense unknown at common law. It applies only to the classes of persons therein naméd. *71 S. v. Whitehurst, 212 N. C., 300, 193 S. E., 657; S. v. Eurell, 220 N. C., 519, 17 S. E. (2d), 669. It does not embrace a vendor in an executory contract of purchase and sale. Hence the court below erred in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss as in case of nonsuit.

The defendant did not appeal from the judgment pronounced in the ease (4430) consolidated and tried with this indictment.' Hence, said judgment is not affected by this opinion.

The judgment below (4477) is

Eeversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.