Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946

State v. . Presnell

State v. . Presnell
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided February 27, 1946 · PER CURIAM.
36 S.E.2d 927; 226 N.C. 160; 1946 N.C. LEXIS 401 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. . Presnell

Opinion of the Court

The defendant, a citizen and resident of Caldwell County, was indicted in Buncombe County for selling butter in said county, which the warrant charged weighed less than represented, in violation of G.S., 81-17. The *Page 161 defendant interposed a plea in abatement on the ground that if the statute had been violated the offense occurred in Caldwell and not in Buncombe County. The plea was denied. Defendant appeals, assigning error. This appeal was due to be heard at the call of the Nineteenth District, on 4 September, 1945. Rule 5 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court,221 N.C. 546. Counsel cannot waive this rule. The rules of this Court are mandatory, and not directory. S. v. Moore, 210 N.C. 459, 187 S.E. 586.

The rules of practice governing the time for docketing appeals in the Supreme Court, or for applying for a writ of certiorari, where the case on appeal, for some cogent reason cannot be docketed within the time prescribed by the rules, has been uniformly enforced since the decision inS. v. Farmer, 188 N.C. 243, 124 S.E. 562. See also Pruitt v. Wood,199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.