Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946

State v. . Ayers

State v. . Ayers
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided October 9, 1946 · PER CURIAM.
39 S.E.2d 607; 226 N.C. 579; 1946 N.C. LEXIS 280 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. . Ayers

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*580 Per Curiam.

The defendant contends that notwithstanding his plea of nolo contendere, the court could not pronounce judgment without determining his guilt or innocence. The contention is without merit. A plea of nolo contendere is equivalent to a plea of guilty, in so far as it gives the court power to punish; and the court may impose sentence thereon as upon a plea of guilty. S. v. Parker, 220 N. C., 416, 17 S. E. (2d), 475; S. v. Burnett, 174 N. C., 796, 93 S. E., 473.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.