State v. . Thomas
State v. . Thomas
38 S.E.2d 166; 226 N.C. 384; 1946 N.C. LEXIS 454
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
State v. . Thomas
Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s only exception was to the charge of the court for failure to “charge the law and facts relative to this case.” As frankly admitted in defendant’s brief this is unpointed broadside. Rawls v. Lupton, 193 N. C., 428, 137 S. E., 175. The record shows the trial free from error. The Attorney-General moves in this Court that the judgment below be affirmed. The defendant does not resist the motion.
The motion is allowed, and the judgment
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.