Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946

State v. . Thomas

State v. . Thomas
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided May 22, 1946 · PER CURIAM.
38 S.E.2d 166; 226 N.C. 384; 1946 N.C. LEXIS 454 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. . Thomas

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s only exception was to the charge of the court for failure to “charge the law and facts relative to this case.” As frankly admitted in defendant’s brief this is unpointed broadside. Rawls v. Lupton, 193 N. C., 428, 137 S. E., 175. The record shows the trial free from error. The Attorney-General moves in this Court that the judgment below be affirmed. The defendant does not resist the motion.

The motion is allowed, and the judgment

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.