State v. . Thomas

Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. . Thomas, 38 S.E.2d 166 (N.C. 1946)
226 N.C. 384; 1946 N.C. LEXIS 454
PER CURIAM.

State v. . Thomas

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s only exception was to the charge of the court for failure to “charge the law and facts relative to this case.” As frankly admitted in defendant’s brief this is unpointed broadside. Rawls v. Lupton, 193 N. C., 428, 137 S. E., 175. The record shows the trial free from error. The Attorney-General moves in this Court that the judgment below be affirmed. The defendant does not resist the motion.

The motion is allowed, and the judgment

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
State v. Duncan Thomas.
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published