Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948

Satterfield v. . Manning

Satterfield v. . Manning
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided January 30, 1948 · Devin, Sohenok
46 S.E.2d 104; 228 N.C. 471; 1948 N.C. LEXIS 253 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Satterfield v. . Manning

Opinion of the Court

DeviN, J.

In view of the opinion in Satterfield v. Manning, ante, 467, holding that the demurrer to the complaint in that action should have been sustained, and that thus the alleged rights of the plaintiffs as creditors of the estate of Sallie A. Rigsbee were not upheld, it follows *472 that plaintiffs’ proceeding as creditors against certain real estate of the decedent must fail.

For this reason, the judgment below must be

Reversed.

Sohenok, Jv took no pai’t in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.