Muse v. Muse
Muse v. Muse
Opinion
When no matter of law or legal inference is involved, the granting or refusing a new trial upon all or any one of the issues rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge. G.S. 1-207; Hawley v. Powell, 222 N.C. 713, 24 S.E. 2d 523; Campbell v. Laundry, 190 N.C. 649, 130 S.E. 638; Billings v. Observer, 150 N.C. 540, 64 S.E. 435; Jarrett v. Trunk Co., 144 N.C. 299, 56 S.E. 937; Benton v. Collins, 125 N.C. 83, 34 S.E. 242, 47 L.R.A. 33; McIntosh on North Carolina Practice and Procedure in Civil Cases, section 611. The record does not indicate that the judge abused his discretion in setting aside the verdict on the third issue and in awarding a partial new trial limited to that issue. Indeed, it supports the contrary conclusion. Inasmuch as no judgment has been entered in the cause, the present appeal is premature, and must be dismissed. Hawley v. Powell, supra.
Appeal dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- L. A. Muse, Gus Muse, Dave Muse, Mamie Muse Young, Jess Muse, Cecil Muse, Russ Muse, Shirley Muse Bryson, Ray Robinson, Bertha Robinson Smathers and Rhetta Robinson Rhymer, v. Elva Muse, Gladys Muse Hall, and John Muse
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published