State v. Mintz
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Tyner (N.C. Ct. App. 1980)
- State v. Harward (N.C. 1965)
- Perkins v. State of North Carolina (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 1964)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
G.S. 14-177 defines the crime against nature as an “abominable and detestable” crime, and we held in & v. Spivey, 213 N.C. 45, 195 S.E. 1, that an attempt to commit the crime thus defined is an infamous act within the meaning of G.S. 14-3. We still adhere to that decision. Hence the sentence imposed in the court below was within the limitations permitted by law.
The other exceptive assignments of error present no substantial question which requires discussion. They fail to point out prejudicial error. Therefore, in .the trial below we find
No error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.