State v. Mintz
Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Mintz, 89 S.E.2d 463 (N.C. 1955)
242 N.C. 761; 1955 N.C. LEXIS 678
Per Curiam
State v. Mintz
Opinion
G.S. 14-177 defines the crime against nature as an “abominable and detestable” crime, and we held in & v. Spivey, 213 N.C. 45, 195 S.E. 1, that an attempt to commit the crime thus defined is an infamous act within the meaning of G.S. 14-3. We still adhere to that decision. Hence the sentence imposed in the court below was within the limitations permitted by law.
The other exceptive assignments of error present no substantial question which requires discussion. They fail to point out prejudicial error. Therefore, in .the trial below we find
No error.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State v. Norman Lee Mintz; And State v. William Floyd Ballington
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published