State v. Mintz

Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Mintz, 89 S.E.2d 463 (N.C. 1955)
242 N.C. 761; 1955 N.C. LEXIS 678
Per Curiam

State v. Mintz

Opinion

PeR CuRiam.

G.S. 14-177 defines the crime against nature as an “abominable and detestable” crime, and we held in & v. Spivey, 213 N.C. 45, 195 S.E. 1, that an attempt to commit the crime thus defined is an infamous act within the meaning of G.S. 14-3. We still adhere to that decision. Hence the sentence imposed in the court below was within the limitations permitted by law.

The other exceptive assignments of error present no substantial question which requires discussion. They fail to point out prejudicial error. Therefore, in .the trial below we find

No error.

Reference

Full Case Name
State v. Norman Lee Mintz; And State v. William Floyd Ballington
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published