Crump v. Eckerd's, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Moody v. Town of Carrboro (N.C. 1980)
- Hill v. Shanks (N.C. Ct. App. 1969)
- Consolidated Vending Co. v. Turner (N.C. 1966)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Eckerd’s, Inc., is a Forth Carolina corporation. Eckérd Drugs, Inc., is a Delaware corporation.
G-.S. 1-163 is captioned “Amendments in Discretion of Court.” The material part of this statute reads: “The judge or court may, before and after judgment, in furtherance of justice, and on such terms as may be proper, amend any pleading, process or proceeding, ... by correcting a mistake in the name of a party . . .”
It is not necessary for us to decide whether the plaintiff by his motion is seeking to correct a mistake in the name of the defendant, or is seeking to substitute a different corporation for the present defendant without service of process. The trial court in its discretion denied plaintiff’s motion. No manifest abuse of discretion is made to appear. The court’s ruling is not subject to review. Gordon v. Gas Co., 178 N.C. 435, 100 S.E. 878; Hogsed v. Pearlman, 213 N.C. 240, 195 S.E. 789; Byers v. Byers, 223 N.C. 85, 25 S.E. 2d 466; Pharr v. Pharr, 223 N.C. 115, 25 S.E. 2d 471.
The judgment of the lower court is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.