Scott v. Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Scott v. Scott, 242 N.C. 733 (N.C. 1955)
89 S.E.2d 417; 1955 N.C. LEXIS 672
Consideration, Higgins, Took, Winborne

Scott v. Scott

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The jury, on conflicting evidence, resolved the contested (second) issue in defendant’s favor; and there was ample evi*734dence to support this verdict. After careful consideration of plaintiff’s assignments of error, we find no error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.

WiNBORNE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name
CLYDE M. SCOTT v. JOE C. SCOTT
Status
Published