State v. Smith
State v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
The Court being evenly divided in opinion as to whether'error prejudicial to defendant is shown in the record on this appeal, Higgins, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed without becoming a precedent. Cole v. R. R., 211 N.C. 591, 191 S.E. 353; Allen v. Ins. Co., 211 N.C. 736, 190 S.E. 735, and cases cited. See also Johnston v. Paper Co., 214 N.C. 828, 199 S.E. 20; Toxey v. Meggs, 216 N.C. 798, 4 S.E. 2d 513; Howard v. Coach Co., 216 N.C. 799, 4 S.E. 2d 616; Whitehurst v. Anderson, 228 N.C. 787, 44 S.E. 2d 358; S. v. Brown, 242 N.C. 602, 89 S.E. 2d 157; Refrigerator Co. v. Davenport, 242 N.C. 603, 89 S.E. 2d 153; Railway v. Railway, ante, 110, and numerous others.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.