Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956

Scott v. BURLINGTON MILLS CORPORATION

Scott v. BURLINGTON MILLS CORPORATION
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided November 28, 1956 · Cueiam, Johnson, Denny
95 S.E.2d 273; 245 N.C. 100; 1956 N.C. LEXIS 535; 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2265 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Scott v. BURLINGTON MILLS CORPORATION

Opinion

PeR Cueiam.

The complaint nowhere alleges that the discharge was in breach of any contract of employment. Without such contract, a discharge is not wrongful. No cause of action has been stated because of the termination of the employment. May v. Power Co., 216 N.C. 439, 5 S.E. 2d 308; Howell v. Credit Corp., 238 N.C. 442, 78 S.E. 2d 146. As only one cause of action is alleged, the judgment sustaining the demurrer is

Reversed.

JohnsoN, J., not sitting. *102 DeNNY, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑