Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1956

328 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1956.

  • State ex rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Youngblood Truck Lines, Inc. 91 S.E.2d 221, (N.C. 1956)
  • State v. Hooker 90 S.E.2d 690, (N.C. 1956)
  • Burton v. City of Reidsville 90 S.E.2d 700, (N.C. 1956)
  • Watts v. Brewer 90 S.E.2d 764, (N.C. 1956)
  • Tart v. Byrne 90 S.E.2d 692, (N.C. 1956)
  • Town of Blowing Rock v. Gregorie 90 S.E.2d 898, (N.C. 1956)
  • Bailey v. Bailey 90 S.E.2d 696, (N.C. 1956)
  • Commercial Credit Corporation v. Robeson Motors 90 S.E.2d 886, (N.C. 1956)
  • State v. Simpson 90 S.E.2d 708, (N.C. 1956)
  • FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Raynor 90 S.E.2d 894, (N.C. 1956)
  • Weavil v. Myers 90 S.E.2d 733, (N.C. 1956)
  • Williamson v. Clay 90 S.E.2d 727, (N.C. 1956)
  • Lovin v. Town of Hamlet 90 S.E.2d 760, (N.C. 1956)
  • State v. Kluckhohn 90 S.E.2d 768, (N.C. 1956)
  • State v. McGowan 90 S.E.2d 703, (N.C. 1956)
  • Petty v. Cranston Print Works Company 90 S.E.2d 717, (N.C. 1956)
  • Pope Ex Rel. Pope v. Patterson 90 S.E.2d 706, (N.C. 1956)
  • Richter v. Harmon 90 S.E.2d 744, (N.C. 1956)
  • Sanders v. Chavis 90 S.E.2d 749, (N.C. 1956)
  • Convent of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chestnut Hill v. City of Winston-Salem 90 S.E.2d 879, (N.C. 1956)
  • State v. Long 90 S.E.2d 739, (N.C. 1956)
  • Harris v. Atlantic Greyhound Corporation 90 S.E.2d 710, (N.C. 1956)
  • Kennedy v. Parrott 90 S.E.2d 754, (N.C. 1956)
  • Commercial Credit Corp. v. Barnes 90 S.E.2d 893, (N.C. 1956)
  • Norton v. Town of Hamlet 90 S.E.2d 764, (N.C. 1956)
  • Williams v. Stumpf 90 S.E.2d 688, (N.C. 1956)
  • Harris v. Carolina Power & Light Co. 90 S.E.2d 694, (N.C. 1956)
  • Cheshire v. Wright 90 S.E.2d 687, (N.C. 1956)
« Prev 1 … 5 6 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑