Floyd v. Dickey
Floyd v. Dickey
96 S.E.2d 731; 245 N.C. 589; 1957 N.C. LEXIS 609
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Floyd v. Dickey
Opinion
Dickey’s asserted liability is predicated on the theory of respondeat superior. There is no evidence to show that Crisp in moving the truck was the agent of Dickey and about his master’s business. Plaintiff does not have the benefit of G.S. 20-71.1 as she waited more than one year after the cause of action accrued before instituting suit. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.