Floyd v. Dickey

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Floyd v. Dickey, 96 S.E.2d 731 (N.C. 1957)
245 N.C. 589; 1957 N.C. LEXIS 609
Per Curiam

Floyd v. Dickey

Opinion

PeR Curiam.

Dickey’s asserted liability is predicated on the theory of respondeat superior. There is no evidence to show that Crisp in moving the truck was the agent of Dickey and about his master’s business. Plaintiff does not have the benefit of G.S. 20-71.1 as she waited more than one year after the cause of action accrued before instituting suit. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Mrs. Nora C. Floyd v. Frank Dickey and Wayne Crisp
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published