Floyd v. Dickey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Floyd v. Dickey, 96 S.E.2d 731 (N.C. 1957)
245 N.C. 589; 1957 N.C. LEXIS 609
Per Curiam
Floyd v. Dickey
Opinion
Dickey’s asserted liability is predicated on the theory of respondeat superior. There is no evidence to show that Crisp in moving the truck was the agent of Dickey and about his master’s business. Plaintiff does not have the benefit of G.S. 20-71.1 as she waited more than one year after the cause of action accrued before instituting suit. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Mrs. Nora C. Floyd v. Frank Dickey and Wayne Crisp
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published