Archer v. Cline

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Archer v. Cline, 98 S.E.2d 889 (N.C. 1957)
246 N.C. 545; 1957 N.C. LEXIS 476
Per Curiam

Archer v. Cline

Opinion

PeR CüRiam.

The parties have stipulated, and filed with this Court under date 10 June, 1957, stipulation in which it is agreed (1) that the bond election, sought to be enjoined, was held on Saturday, 8 June, 1957, and (2) that on Moriday, 10 June, 1957, the election returns were canvassed and the official results announced. Thus it appears that the act sought to be enjoined or restrained has been consummated. Hence whether defendants should have been restrained pending final hearing becomes and is now an academic or moot question, and the appeal will be dismissed. As stated in Austin v. Dare County, 240 N.C. 662, 83 S.E. 2d 702: “It is quite obvious that a court cannot restrain the doing of that which has been already consummated,” citing cases, and “plaintiff’s appeal must be dismissed.” See also Smith v. Freeman, 243 N.C. 692, 91 S.E. 2d 925; Walker v. Moss, 246 N.C. 196, 97 S.E. 2d 836.

Appeal dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
A. W. ARCHER, a Taxpayer of CLEVELAND COUNTY, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Taxpayers of CLEVELAND COUNTY, v. Z. v. CLINE, Chairman; KNOX SARRATT, F. L. ROLLINS, JOHN D. WHITE, and H. B. BUMGARDNER, Members, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR CLEVELAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published