Duncan v. Renfrow
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Duncan v. Renfrow, 246 N.C. 197 (N.C. 1957)
97 S.E.2d 685; 1957 N.C. LEXIS 382
Duncan v. Renfrow
Opinion of the Court
The only assignment of error brought forward in appellant’s brief, to wit, the denial by Judge Morris at February Civil Term, 1955, of his motion for judgment on the pleadings, is manifestly without merit. The sole basis for said motion was the alleged insufficiency of the allegations of the original petition. Appellant ignores the fact that, by leave of court, the original petition was amended, and that the trial was on the issues raised by the amended pleadings. The
No error.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- O. L. DUNCAN, Administrator of the Estate of SELLARS STANCIL v. MARY S. RENFROW, STEPHEN STANCIL and Wife, RONIE STANCIL, ROBY RENFROW and Wife, MRS. ROBY RENFROW
- Status
- Published