Benbow v. Caudle
Benbow v. Caudle
108 S.E.2d 663; 250 N.C. 371; 1959 N.C. LEXIS 668
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Koury v. John Meyer of Norwich (N.C. Ct. App. 1980)
- Petrou v. Hale (N.C. Ct. App. 1979)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s evidence when considered in the light most favorable to him fails to make out a prima facie case of malicious abuse of process in accordance with the controlling principles laid down in Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 431, 88 S.E. 2d 223. There is no evidence of abuse or misuse of the execution after its issuance. The judgment below is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.