Johnson v. Lámar
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Arnold v. Ray Charles Enterprises, Inc. (N.C. 1965)
- Ernest Gary Johnson v. Lloyd Parrish Homer Pinnell, D/B/A Pinnell Farm Chemical Co. Ohio Eastern Express, Inc. (4th Cir. 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The accident involved in present action having occurred in the State of South Carolina, and the action having been instituted in the State of North Carolina, the substantive law of South Carolina determines the cause of action maintainable by plaintiff as well as the measure of damages. In this light plaintiff cites no authority and makes no argument revealing error in the trial below, but rather files in this Court a motion for new trial on account of newly discovered evidence. This motion fails to sustain its purpose, and is denied.
However, attention is directed to the provisions of G.S. 1-25.
For reasons stated the judgment below is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.