New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. Gray
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Brown v. Ford Motor Company (District Court, D. South Carolina 1968)
- Bulliner v. General Motors Corp. (District Court, E.D. North Carolina 1971)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
If the automobile was defective in any respect, the record fails to disclose any evidence, direct or circumstantial, tending to show what the defect consisted of. No causal connection between the excessive heating and the fire is made to appear. Furthermore, there is no contention that heat or fumes had ever been emitted while the car was not in operation. Recovery may not be predicated on conjecture. No evidence has been adduced from which the cause of the fire may be reasonably inferred.
The judgment below is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.