Barefoot v. Rulnick
Barefoot v. Rulnick
252 N.C. 483; 113 S.E.2d 921; 1960 N.C. LEXIS 584
Barefoot v. Rulnick
Opinion of the Court
The burden is on appellant to show prejudicial error amounting to the denial of some substantial right. Kennedy v. James, 252 N.C. 434, . S.E. 2d . A careful examination of defendant’s assignments of error discloses no prejudicial error that would justify a new trial. All these assignments of error are overruled. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.