Barefoot v. Rulnick
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Barefoot v. Rulnick, 252 N.C. 483 (N.C. 1960)
113 S.E.2d 921; 1960 N.C. LEXIS 584
Pee
Barefoot v. Rulnick
Opinion of the Court
The burden is on appellant to show prejudicial error amounting to the denial of some substantial right. Kennedy v. James, 252 N.C. 434, . S.E. 2d . A careful examination of defendant’s assignments of error discloses no prejudicial error that would justify a new trial. All these assignments of error are overruled. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- MRS. ELGIE LEE BAREFOOT v. HARRY LOUIS RULNICK
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published