Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960

Barefoot v. Rulnick

Barefoot v. Rulnick
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided May 4, 1960 · Pee
252 N.C. 483; 113 S.E.2d 921; 1960 N.C. LEXIS 584

Barefoot v. Rulnick

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The burden is on appellant to show prejudicial error amounting to the denial of some substantial right. Kennedy v. James, 252 N.C. 434, . S.E. 2d . A careful examination of defendant’s assignments of error discloses no prejudicial error that would justify a new trial. All these assignments of error are overruled. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.