Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960

Barefoot v. Rulnick

Barefoot v. Rulnick
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided May 4, 1960 · Pee
252 N.C. 483; 113 S.E.2d 921; 1960 N.C. LEXIS 584
Barefoot v. Rulnick

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The burden is on appellant to show prejudicial error amounting to the denial of some substantial right. Kennedy v. James, 252 N.C. 434, . S.E. 2d . A careful examination of defendant’s assignments of error discloses no prejudicial error that would justify a new trial. All these assignments of error are overruled. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.