Barefoot v. Rulnick

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Barefoot v. Rulnick, 252 N.C. 483 (N.C. 1960)
113 S.E.2d 921; 1960 N.C. LEXIS 584
Pee

Barefoot v. Rulnick

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The burden is on appellant to show prejudicial error amounting to the denial of some substantial right. Kennedy v. James, 252 N.C. 434, . S.E. 2d . A careful examination of defendant’s assignments of error discloses no prejudicial error that would justify a new trial. All these assignments of error are overruled. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Reference

Full Case Name
MRS. ELGIE LEE BAREFOOT v. HARRY LOUIS RULNICK
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published