Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961

Dixon v. Young

Dixon v. Young
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided November 1, 1961 · Per Curiam
122 S.E.2d 202; 255 N.C. 578; 1961 N.C. LEXIS 638 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Dixon v. Young

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The plaintiff assigns as error the refusal of the trial judge to set aside the verdict on the issue of damages only and to grant a new trial thereon on the ground that the damages assessed by the jury were inadequate.

β€œThe granting or the denying of a motion for a new trial on the ground that the damages assessed by the jury are excessive or inadequate is within the sound discretion of the trial judge.” Hinton v. Cline, 238 N.C. 136, 76 S.E. 2d 162, and cited cases.

In such cases, in the absence of an abuse of discretion, the ruling of the trial judge is not reviewable on appeal. An abuse of discretion has not been made to appear on this appeal.

No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.