Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961

State v. Bright

State v. Bright
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided March 1, 1961
254 N.C. 226; 118 S.E.2d 411; 1961 N.C. LEXIS 382

State v. Bright

Opinion of the Court

PeR Curiam.

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the charges was not challenged by motion to nonsuit or for directed verdict. To secure a new trial it is necessary for appellant, by proper assignment of error, Hunt v. Davis, 248 N.C. 69, 102 S.E. 2d 405, to show prejudicial error. Barefoot v. Rulnick, 252 N.C. 483, 113 S.E. 2d 921. Here appellant failed in both requirements.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.