State v. Bright

Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Bright, 254 N.C. 226 (N.C. 1961)
118 S.E.2d 411; 1961 N.C. LEXIS 382

State v. Bright

Opinion of the Court

PeR Curiam.

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the charges was not challenged by motion to nonsuit or for directed verdict. To secure a new trial it is necessary for appellant, by proper assignment of error, Hunt v. Davis, 248 N.C. 69, 102 S.E. 2d 405, to show prejudicial error. Barefoot v. Rulnick, 252 N.C. 483, 113 S.E. 2d 921. Here appellant failed in both requirements.

Appeal dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE v. HORACE BRIGHT
Status
Published