State v. Bright
Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Bright, 254 N.C. 226 (N.C. 1961)
118 S.E.2d 411; 1961 N.C. LEXIS 382
State v. Bright
Opinion of the Court
The sufficiency of the evidence to support the charges was not challenged by motion to nonsuit or for directed verdict. To secure a new trial it is necessary for appellant, by proper assignment of error, Hunt v. Davis, 248 N.C. 69, 102 S.E. 2d 405, to show prejudicial error. Barefoot v. Rulnick, 252 N.C. 483, 113 S.E. 2d 921. Here appellant failed in both requirements.
Appeal dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE v. HORACE BRIGHT
- Status
- Published