State v. Bright
State v. Bright
254 N.C. 226; 118 S.E.2d 411; 1961 N.C. LEXIS 382
State v. Bright
Opinion of the Court
The sufficiency of the evidence to support the charges was not challenged by motion to nonsuit or for directed verdict. To secure a new trial it is necessary for appellant, by proper assignment of error, Hunt v. Davis, 248 N.C. 69, 102 S.E. 2d 405, to show prejudicial error. Barefoot v. Rulnick, 252 N.C. 483, 113 S.E. 2d 921. Here appellant failed in both requirements.
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.