Nantz v. Nantz
Nantz v. Nantz
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff’s automobile was traveling northwardly on a paved highway at a speed of 50 m.p.h. in a 55-mile speed zone. The road was straight. The weather was dry and clear. The collision occurred shortly after 8:00 a.m. The Styles car came from a filling station on the east side of the highway. Plaintiff saw the Styles car start to move. “It was moving out towards the road very, very slowly.” She advised her husband to blow the horn. He did so.
There was a bag of candy on the seat between plaintiff and her husband. He and she were eating from the bag when she observed
Plaintiff’s evidence fails to establish her allegations of negligence. Garner v. Pittman, 237 N.C. 328, 75 S.E. 2d 111.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PEARL PATE NANTZ v. IVEY LEE NANTZ, RAY STYLES and VICK STYLES
- Status
- Published