Cratch v. Taylor
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dilday v. Beaufort County Board of Education (N.C. 1966)
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Crowder (N.C. Ct. App. 1988)
- State v. White (N.C. Ct. App. 1986)
- State v. Lampkins (N.C. 1973)
- BROGDEN PRODUCE COMPANY v. Stanley (N.C. 1966)
- State v. Dunn (N.C. 1965)
- Tyndall v. Triangle Mobile Homes, Inc. (N.C. 1965)
- Clark Equipment Company v. Johnson (N.C. 1964)
- In re Kirkman Furniture Company (N.C. 1963)
- State v. Rorie (N.C. 1962)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The assignments of error purport to be supported by exceptions which appear nowhere in the record except in the purported assignments of error. Such exceptions are ineffective and will not be considered on appeal. Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1, 95 S.E. 2d 118. Even so, in the absence of any exceptions, or when exceptions have not been preserved in accordance with the requirements of our Rules, the appeal will be taken as an exception to the judgment. An exception to the signing of the judgment presents nothing for review except whether or not the court’s conclusion of law is supported by the finding or findings of fact; such exception does not challenge the correctness of any findings of fact. Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41, 123 S.E. 2d 209.
When no exception has been taken to a finding of fact, such finding is presumed to be supported by competent evidence and is binding on appeal. Goldsboro v. RR., 246 N.C. 101, 97 S.E. 2d 486.
In this case, the finding of the court below supports the judgment and it is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.