Sprueill v. Hamlet

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sprueill v. Hamlet, 260 N.C. 546 (N.C. 1963)
133 S.E.2d 173; 1963 N.C. LEXIS 755
Cuhiam

Sprueill v. Hamlet

Opinion of the Court

PeR Cuhiam.

We have carefully examined the evidence. We are of ■the opinion and hold that, when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, it is sufficient to permit a jury to find the facts to be a® alleged by plaintiff. If the facts be a® plaintiff alleges, defendant is liable. No useful purpose would be served by detailed analysis of the evidence. In accord with our practice, Weaver v. Bennett, 259 N.C. 16, 129 S.E. 2d 610, discussion of the evidence is omitted.

Reversed.

Reference

Full Case Name
MRS. BERTHA SPRUEILL, Administratrix of the Estate of MAURICE SPRUEILL, JR. v. LINARD HAMLET
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published