Sprueill v. Hamlet
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sprueill v. Hamlet, 260 N.C. 546 (N.C. 1963)
133 S.E.2d 173; 1963 N.C. LEXIS 755
Cuhiam
Sprueill v. Hamlet
Opinion of the Court
We have carefully examined the evidence. We are of ■the opinion and hold that, when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, it is sufficient to permit a jury to find the facts to be a® alleged by plaintiff. If the facts be a® plaintiff alleges, defendant is liable. No useful purpose would be served by detailed analysis of the evidence. In accord with our practice, Weaver v. Bennett, 259 N.C. 16, 129 S.E. 2d 610, discussion of the evidence is omitted.
Reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- MRS. BERTHA SPRUEILL, Administratrix of the Estate of MAURICE SPRUEILL, JR. v. LINARD HAMLET
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published